Skip to main content
CybersecurityHQ Structural Conditions Board
Primary navigation
Issue 46 · as of Issue No. 46, 12 November 2026 (observation cutoff 9 November 2026; collection closed 9 November, 16:28 UTC) · Snapshot ea7de8184295

Correction: four forecast entries shared one placeholder ledger hash

Every record in this file was ratified by the publisher on 2026-11-12 and is in force. The declared field gives the date the correction was first recorded.

id
CHQ-CORR-2026-033
class
CORRECTION
subtype
provenance
status
IN FORCE
authority
DM ratified 2026-11-12
effective
2026-11-12
published
2026-11-12
title
Correction: four forecast entries shared one placeholder ledger hash
what was wrong
The four Structural Outlooks issued on 26 October 2026, SO-2026-014 to SO-2026-017, were recorded with one identical ledger hash, c2f1ab40c70d9013. The rule is one hash per entry, computed over its identifier, claim, probability, issued timestamp and resolution rule.
what is true
Recomputing every issued entry showed SO-2026-001 to SO-2026-012 match their stored hashes exactly, which confirms the serialization, and the four did not. The correct values are 90cb7adf89c670ea, d64f476e4a706f44, 17fc34056e1e81f5 and d2c9e86c0519d259, in entry order.
what changed
The four hashes are corrected and the placeholder is preserved in each entry's revision log. The gate now verifies forecast hashes and blocks on a mismatch or on a hash shared between issued entries.
what did not change
No claim, probability, resolution rule or issued timestamp. No forecast was issued or resolved by the fix and no score is affected. No count, rating, Outlook or Watch.
control analysis
The four identical values were a copy error at drafting. The gate did not check forecast hashes, so the lock the hash is meant to provide was not being tested. The new check closes that and has negative tests behind it.
found by
An external adversarial audit, verified by recomputation.