Correction: the counting trigger for two candidates on Autonomous AI Attack Operations was stated as either of two elements; it needs both

Every record in this file was ratified by the publisher on 2026-11-12 and is in force. The declared field gives the date the correction was first recorded.

id: CHQ-CORR-2026-041
class: CORRECTION
subtype: editorial
status: IN FORCE
authority: DM ratified 2026-11-12
effective: 2026-11-12
published: 2026-11-12
title: Correction: the counting trigger for two candidates on Autonomous AI Attack Operations was stated as either of two elements; it needs both
what was wrong: Issue No. 45, Section E, and first drafts of Issue No. 46 said the two held candidates on SC-2026-008 would count on either a source statement about the degree of human direction or an artifact tying the intrusions to the agent framework.
what is true: The condition's scope requires that the agent held the operational role end to end with minimal human direction. An artifact tying the activity to the framework shows that the framework acted, not that it acted unattended. Both elements are required.
what changed: Issue No. 46 and both candidate rows state the trigger with both elements. Replacement wording for the Issue No. 45 sentence was drafted for the publisher.
what did not change: No count, rating, Outlook or Watch. Both candidates were held on the second element under either wording.
control analysis: The trigger was paraphrased from memory of the reproduction result and not checked against the scope text. A reviewer reading the shortened edition caught it.
found by: An external adversarial review of the Issue No. 46 Email Edition.