Skip to main content
CybersecurityHQ Structural Conditions Board
Primary navigation
Issue 46 · as of Issue No. 46, 12 November 2026 (observation cutoff 9 November 2026; collection closed 9 November, 16:28 UTC) · Snapshot ea7de8184295

Correction: a content-management flaw was disclosed a day earlier than recorded, so its pre-disclosure candidacy is withdrawn

Every record in this file was ratified by the publisher on 2026-11-12 and is in force. The declared field gives the date the correction was first recorded.

id
CHQ-CORR-2026-030
class
CORRECTION
subtype
counting
status
IN FORCE
authority
DM ratified 2026-11-12
effective
2026-11-12
published
2026-11-12
title
Correction: a content-management flaw was disclosed a day earlier than recorded, so its pre-disclosure candidacy is withdrawn
what was wrong
The record gave 29 October 2026 as the first public disclosure of WordPress Core CVE-2026-119977, taken from a secondary advisory date, and carried the entry as a candidate for Pre-Disclosure Exploitation because an exploitation attempt was observed on 28 October.
what is true
The vendor's own announcement is timestamped 28 October at 17:13 UTC. The first observed attempt followed at about 20:39 UTC the same day. With a timestamp on both events the chronology is determinate and post-disclosure.
what changed
The disclosure date is corrected to 28 October and the candidate status is withdrawn; the entry is recorded as not in shape for the condition. The previous values are kept in the row note. The attempt telemetry is kept as evidence of attempts, not of compromise.
what did not change
No count, rating, Outlook or Watch. The entry's routing as a reinforcing entry on the edge condition stands.
control analysis
A secondary date stood in for the primary. The audit that found it asked for the chronology to be marked indeterminate; reading the primaries showed it was determinate, which is the stronger correction. Reading the vendor primary for the disclosure date is a protocol rule, not a mechanical control.
found by
An external adversarial audit, verified by CHQ against the primaries.