Correction: nine pattern counters were arithmetically impossible
Every record in this file was ratified by the publisher on 2026-11-12 and is in force. The declared field gives the date the correction was first recorded.
- id
- CHQ-CORR-2026-025
- class
- CORRECTION
- subtype
- control
- status
- IN FORCE
- authority
- DM ratified 2026-11-12
- effective
- 2026-11-12
- published
- 2026-11-12
- title
- Correction: nine pattern counters were arithmetically impossible
- what was wrong
- In an internal pattern summary, nine rows carried a 30-day reinforcement count larger than the 90-day count. The fields were maintained by hand and nothing recomputed them; several values were cumulative totals entered in the 30-day column. The summary also held one duplicate row and one misplaced cell.
- what is true
- These counters feed no condition count, rating or Outlook. The trigger engine computes its own windows from the evidence rows.
- what changed
- Every counter was recomputed from typed fields under a stated rule: 30 and 90 calendar days ending on the run date, counting reinforcing and counted entries by catalog date, or by signal date where no catalog date exists. Sub-class counters were cleared because sub-class attribution is not held in a field. The duplicate row was marked and the misplaced text moved. Prior values are preserved in every earlier artifact.
- what did not change
- Every condition count, rating and Outlook.
- control analysis
- A gate check was added the same day so that an impossible counter cannot recur silently. The first application of this correction failed to clear some cells it logged as cleared; a negative test added with the new check caught that on its first run, and the cells were then cleared.
- found by
- An external adversarial review.