Correction: two further over-claims, one of them inside the correction written to fix the previous one
Every record in this file was ratified by the publisher on 2026-11-12 and is in force. The declared field gives the date the correction was first recorded.
- id
- CHQ-CORR-2026-021
- class
- CORRECTION
- subtype
- editorial
- status
- IN FORCE
- authority
- DM ratified 2026-11-12
- effective
- 2026-11-12
- published
- 2026-11-12
- title
- Correction: two further over-claims, one of them inside the correction written to fix the previous one
- what was wrong
- The amended criterion question (CHQ-CRIT-QUESTION-2026-001) said that for all three availability-only entries the impact is stated both in the catalog entry and in the record's own fields. That is true of two. For SN-2026-08-12-01 the record states no impact, so the reading rests on the catalog description alone. Separately, a run note and the briefing grouped three blocked document retrievals as refused by the collection environment's network boundary. Two were; the third was refused by the source site itself.
- what is true
- The enumeration of three availability-only entries is correct. For one of them the record is silent and does not corroborate the catalog. The three blocked retrievals had two different causes.
- what changed
- The criterion question is amended to say which entries the record corroborates. The retrieval note states each cause separately, and a figure built on a single cause is withdrawn.
- what did not change
- No rating, Outlook, counted set or published text, and no count.
- control analysis
- The amendment that criticized reading a catalog in place of the record then asserted record corroboration where the record says nothing. Writing a correction about over-claiming did not prevent over-claiming in the same paragraph. The recurrence is recorded as the fourth of the week; the remedy is a check of each summarizing sentence against the row it summarizes, which remained a working practice and not a mechanical control.
- found by
- An external adversarial review, verified against the record before acceptance.