# Correction: the counting trigger for two candidates on Autonomous AI Attack Operations was stated as either of two elements; it needs both

- **Artifact ID:** CHQ-CORR-2026-041
- **Status:** IN FORCE
- **Public record:** https://record.cybersecurityhq.com/corrections/chq-corr-2026-041
- **Machine-record SHA-256:** `7f8770fd32882169029508b6256ca688281e13a950579b51b951159a879e8dea`

## Complete structured record

```json
{
  "id": "CHQ-CORR-2026-041",
  "class": "CORRECTION",
  "subtype": "editorial",
  "status": "IN FORCE",
  "authority": "DM ratified 2026-11-12",
  "effective": "2026-11-12",
  "published": "2026-11-12",
  "title": "Correction: the counting trigger for two candidates on Autonomous AI Attack Operations was stated as either of two elements; it needs both",
  "what_was_wrong": "Issue No. 45, Section E, and first drafts of Issue No. 46 said the two held candidates on SC-2026-008 would count on either a source statement about the degree of human direction or an artifact tying the intrusions to the agent framework.",
  "what_is_true": "The condition's scope requires that the agent held the operational role end to end with minimal human direction. An artifact tying the activity to the framework shows that the framework acted, not that it acted unattended. Both elements are required.",
  "what_changed": "Issue No. 46 and both candidate rows state the trigger with both elements. Replacement wording for the Issue No. 45 sentence was drafted for the publisher.",
  "what_did_not_change": "No count, rating, Outlook or Watch. Both candidates were held on the second element under either wording.",
  "control_analysis": "The trigger was paraphrased from memory of the reproduction result and not checked against the scope text. A reviewer reading the shortened edition caught it.",
  "found_by": "An external adversarial review of the Issue No. 46 Email Edition."
}
```